us iran Archives - WABSNEWS

Deal with US not imminent, Iran says

Iran has said that a final agreement with the United States is “not imminent,” despite reports of progress in ongoing negotiations aimed at easing regional tensions and ending months of conflict in the Middle East. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stated that Tehran and Washington had reached understandings on several major issues, but warned that significant differences still remain between the two sides. The comments came after senior US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, suggested that a breakthrough could happen soon. However, Iranian officials accused Washington of sending mixed signals and changing positions during negotiations, making it difficult to finalize a deal quickly. The discussions are believed to involve extending the current ceasefire, reopening the Strait of Hormuz to global shipping, and creating a framework for future talks over Iran’s nuclear programme. Iran has insisted that the current negotiations are focused mainly on ending hostilities and reducing military tensions, not directly on nuclear matters. The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the key issues in the talks because it is a vital route for global oil shipments. Continued uncertainty over the waterway has already pushed energy markets into volatility and increased concerns about global supply disruptions. Analysts say any delay in reaching a deal could keep oil prices elevated and prolong instability across the region. US President Donald Trump has also said negotiators should not rush into an agreement, stressing that Washington would only accept a “strong and meaningful” deal. Meanwhile, regional powers including Qatar, Oman and Pakistan continue diplomatic efforts to mediate between Tehran and Washington.

Iran accuses US of ‘reckless military adventure’

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

Iran sharply criticized the United States on Friday, accusing Washington of pursuing a “reckless military adventure” instead of diplomacy as tensions in the Middle East continued to rise. The remarks came from Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi following renewed clashes involving US naval forces near the strategic Strait of Hormuz. According to Iranian officials, recent US military actions violated an already fragile ceasefire agreement reached after weeks of escalating conflict in the Gulf region. Tehran alleged that American strikes targeted civilian coastal areas and Iranian-linked vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil shipping route. Iranian military authorities described the attacks as “aggressive” and warned that the country would respond decisively to any further escalation. The United States, however, defended its operations as acts of self-defense. US Central Command stated that American naval destroyers came under missile, drone, and small-boat attacks from Iranian forces while transiting international waters. Washington said it responded by targeting Iranian missile launch sites and military infrastructure connected to the assaults. Araghchi argued that “every time a diplomatic solution is on the table, the US opts for a reckless military adventure,” adding that Iran would not surrender under pressure. His comments reflected Tehran’s growing frustration over stalled negotiations and ongoing military pressure from Washington and its regional allies. The escalating confrontation has fueled fears of wider instability across the Middle East, especially around the Strait of Hormuz, through which a major portion of the world’s oil supply passes. Global markets remain on edge as investors monitor the possibility of further military escalation, disruptions to shipping lanes, and rising energy prices. Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts led by regional mediators including Qatar continue in hopes of preventing a broader regional conflict.

Hantavirus outbreak on cruise ship not start of pandemic, UN health agency says

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

The World Health Organization has said a recent hantavirus outbreak linked to a cruise ship should not be viewed as the beginning of a global pandemic, seeking to calm public fears after several passengers fell ill during a voyage in Asia. Health officials stressed that hantavirus infections are rare and are typically spread through exposure to rodents or their droppings rather than through sustained human-to-human transmission. According to the agency, investigators are examining sanitation conditions aboard the vessel after passengers reported flu-like symptoms including fever, fatigue, and respiratory complications. Several individuals were hospitalized for observation, while close contacts were monitored as a precaution. Authorities emphasized that there is currently no evidence the virus is spreading widely among travelers or communities beyond the ship. Hantavirus can cause severe respiratory disease in humans, but outbreaks are generally localized. Experts noted that unlike highly contagious viruses such as COVID-19, hantavirus does not usually spread easily between people. Most infections occur when individuals inhale particles contaminated by infected rodents. Public health officials therefore believe the incident can be contained through isolation measures, sanitation procedures, and medical monitoring. Cruise operators have reportedly increased cleaning operations and health screenings as investigations continue. Travelers were also advised to maintain hygiene precautions and report symptoms immediately if they experience fever or breathing difficulties after recent travel. The UN health agency urged the public not to panic or spread misinformation online, warning that exaggerated claims about a “new pandemic” could create unnecessary fear. Officials added that global surveillance systems remain active and that international health authorities are coordinating closely to monitor developments surrounding the outbreak.

US says it has attacked Iranian-flagged ship as Israel launches air strike on Beirut

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

The United States has confirmed that it carried out an attack on an Iranian-flagged vessel in a significant escalation of tensions across the Middle East, while almost simultaneously, Israel launched a fresh airstrike on the Lebanese capital, Beirut. The developments underscore a rapidly intensifying regional crisis involving multiple flashpoints. According to officials from the United States Department of Defense, the targeted ship was believed to be involved in activities that posed a security threat, though specific operational details remain limited. The strike marks a notable expansion of direct US actions against assets linked to Iran amid ongoing maritime tensions in key shipping corridors. Meanwhile, Israel confirmed it conducted an airstrike on what it described as militant infrastructure in Beirut. Lebanese sources reported damage in parts of the city, raising concerns about civilian safety and the potential for further escalation. The strike is part of Israel’s broader campaign against groups it accuses of receiving Iranian backing. The dual developments highlight the increasingly interconnected nature of regional conflicts, where actions at sea and in urban centers are shaping a wider geopolitical confrontation. Analysts warn that the involvement of both US and Israeli forces in separate but related operations could provoke retaliatory responses from Iran or its allied groups. International reactions have begun to emerge, with calls for restraint from several global actors concerned about the risk of a broader war. The situation remains fluid, with military readiness reportedly heightened across multiple countries in the region. As tensions rise, the possibility of further strikes or countermeasures cannot be ruled out, making this one of the most volatile moments in Middle Eastern geopolitics in recent months.

Iran says US has responded to its latest peace proposal

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

Iran has confirmed that the United States has responded to its latest peace proposal, signaling a fragile but ongoing diplomatic exchange amid heightened tensions in the Middle East. The development comes after Tehran submitted a new multi-point plan—reportedly a 14-point framework—through intermediaries, aiming to end hostilities and ease the standoff that has disrupted global energy markets. According to recent reports, Iranian officials indicated that Washington has reviewed and reacted to the proposal, though details of the U.S. response remain limited. The exchange follows weeks of indirect negotiations, often facilitated by third parties such as Pakistan, highlighting the absence of direct diplomatic engagement between the two sides. U.S. President Donald Trump has taken a cautious and skeptical stance. While acknowledging receipt of Iran’s proposal, he has suggested that the terms may not be acceptable, warning that military options—including renewed airstrikes—remain on the table if negotiations fail. Reports indicate Trump believes Iran has “not yet paid a big enough price,” underscoring the administration’s hardline posture. Iran’s proposal is believed to include key demands such as lifting U.S. sanctions, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and reducing military pressure in the region. In return, Tehran has signaled willingness to engage in phased de-escalation, though it insists on preserving its strategic and nuclear interests. Despite this exchange, the situation remains volatile. Ongoing incidents in the Strait of Hormuz and continued military threats from both sides illustrate how fragile the diplomatic process is. Analysts note that while both countries appear interested in avoiding prolonged conflict, deep mistrust and conflicting demands continue to hinder a breakthrough. In summary, while Iran says the U.S. has responded to its latest peace proposal, the path to a comprehensive agreement remains uncertain, with diplomacy and military pressure unfolding simultaneously.

Trump repeats that he is ‘not happy’ with Iran as deadline to seek approval for war looms

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

U.S. President Donald Trump has reiterated that he is “not happy” with Iran as a కీల moment approaches in Washington: the legal deadline requiring congressional approval for continued military involvement. The statement underscores rising tension between diplomatic efforts and domestic legal constraints tied to the ongoing conflict. Trump’s dissatisfaction centers on Iran’s latest proposals to end hostilities, which he has described as unacceptable and insufficient. According to recent reports, he believes Tehran’s leadership remains divided and unwilling to meet core U.S. demands, particularly on abandoning nuclear ambitions. Despite indirect negotiations through mediators, progress has stalled, leaving the situation in a fragile ceasefire rather than a lasting resolution. At the same time, the administration faces pressure under the War Powers Resolution, which mandates that a president must seek congressional authorization within 60 days of initiating military action. That deadline is now looming, placing Trump in a politically sensitive position. Rather than seeking approval, the White House argues that hostilities have effectively “terminated” due to an earlier ceasefire, a legal interpretation widely disputed by lawmakers and experts. Congress remains deeply divided. Efforts by Democrats to force a vote on ending or authorizing the war have repeatedly failed, while many Republicans continue to back Trump’s approach. This impasse increases the likelihood that the deadline will pass without clear legislative action, further intensifying constitutional questions over executive war powers. Meanwhile, Trump has kept military options open, signaling that further strikes remain possible if Iran does not shift its stance. His remarks suggest a dual-track strategy: maintaining pressure through both diplomacy and the threat of force. With no breakthrough in negotiations and legal uncertainty mounting, the coming days are critical. Whether the administration seeks authorization, ignores the deadline, or escalates tensions will significantly shape the trajectory of the U.S.–Iran conflict and broader regional stability.

Oil price soars above $118 after reports of ‘extended’ Iran blockade

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

Oil prices surged sharply on Wednesday, with Brent crude climbing above $118 a barrel after reports that the United States could extend its blockade on Iran, intensifying fears of a prolonged supply shock in global energy markets. The move pushed crude to its highest level in nearly a month and reignited concerns over inflation, transport costs, and fuel prices worldwide. According to market reports, traders reacted after new signals suggested the blockade on Iranian ports may continue longer than previously expected. Iran remains a key oil producer, and any disruption to exports from the Gulf region immediately impacts global supply expectations. Investors are especially concerned because the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil transit routes, remains under pressure amid ongoing tensions. Brent crude futures rose more than 6% to $118.33, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) also jumped above $105. Analysts said the rally was driven not only by geopolitical risk but also by fresh U.S. inventory data showing a larger-than-expected drop in crude stockpiles, indicating tighter supply conditions. Higher oil prices could quickly translate into rising petrol and diesel costs for consumers, especially in import-dependent countries such as India and many European nations. Airlines, shipping firms, and manufacturing sectors may also face higher operating expenses if prices remain elevated. Markets are now watching whether diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran can resume. Any sign of easing tensions could cool prices, while an extended blockade or military escalation may send crude toward $120 or higher. The latest surge highlights how vulnerable global energy markets remain to geopolitical disruptions. With inflation already a concern in many economies, sustained high oil prices could create fresh challenges for central banks and policymakers in the weeks ahead.

Trump and his officials ‘likely’ targets of suspected gunman, acting attorney general says

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

Former President Donald Trump and several of his senior officials were described as “likely” targets of a suspected gunman, according to comments made by the acting attorney general during a press briefing. The statement came as investigators continued examining the suspect’s motives, background, and any possible links to extremist ideologies or organized groups. Authorities said the suspect was detained after a coordinated law enforcement operation, with officers recovering multiple weapons, ammunition, and documents that are now being analyzed. Early findings suggest the individual may have been planning attacks against high-profile political figures, with Trump and members of his inner circle among the most prominent names allegedly identified. The acting attorney general emphasized that there is currently no evidence of an immediate wider threat, but security measures around Trump, campaign offices, and current and former government officials have been strengthened as a precaution. Federal agencies, including the FBI and Secret Service, are working together to trace the suspect’s movements, online activity, and communications in the weeks leading up to the arrest. Political violence has become an increasing concern in the United States, with officials from both major parties warning against heated rhetoric and threats aimed at public servants. The latest case is expected to renew debate over domestic extremism, gun access, and the security challenges faced by candidates during election cycles. Trump’s representatives thanked law enforcement agencies for their swift response and said they remain confident in the security systems protecting the former president. They did not comment further on the specifics of the investigation. Legal experts note that prosecutors will likely pursue serious federal charges if evidence confirms a planned attack on political figures. Such offenses can carry lengthy prison sentences and heightened penalties when threats involve former presidents or protected officials. The case remains under active investigation, and officials have urged the public to avoid speculation until verified facts are released. More details are expected as court documents become public in the coming days.

Nato says ‘no provision’ to expel members after report US could seek to suspend Spain

Afham1 month ago1 month ago03 mins

NATO has said there is “no provision” within its founding treaty to expel member states, following reports that the United States could explore ways to suspend Spain over defense spending disputes. The statement comes amid renewed pressure from Washington on allies to meet military spending commitments. According to alliance officials, the NATO treaty does not contain a mechanism for removing or suspending members once they have joined. Any major institutional changes would likely require unanimous agreement among all member states, making such a move highly unlikely. Reports emerged after growing frustration in the United States regarding burden-sharing within the alliance. Several American officials and lawmakers have repeatedly criticized some European nations for not spending enough on defense, with Spain often cited as one of the lower contributors relative to GDP targets. Spain is a longstanding NATO member and hosts important military facilities used for alliance operations. Spanish officials have defended their contributions, pointing to troop deployments, naval assets, and support for joint missions rather than focusing solely on spending percentages. The issue reflects wider tensions inside NATO as members balance domestic budgets with rising security concerns linked to conflicts in Ukraine and instability in other regions. While calls for greater defense spending continue, diplomats stress unity remains the alliance’s top priority. Analysts say any attempt to sideline Spain would create serious political divisions and distract from collective security goals. For now, NATO has made clear that no formal rule exists to expel members, reinforcing the alliance’s consensus-based structure.

Trump denies being ‘under pressure’ to make Iran deal ahead of ceasefire deadline

Afham2 months ago2 months ago03 mins

U.S. President Donald Trump has denied claims that he is facing pressure to finalize a deal with Iran as the deadline for a temporary ceasefire approaches. Speaking to reporters, Trump insisted negotiations are progressing on Washington’s terms and said he remains confident that Tehran wants an agreement more urgently than the United States does. The ceasefire, brokered earlier this month after weeks of heightened tensions, is set to expire on April 22 unless both sides agree to extend it or reach a broader settlement. Trump rejected suggestions that the White House is rushing to secure a diplomatic breakthrough, saying he is under “no pressure whatsoever” and that the U.S. has multiple options if talks fail. Recent comments from Trump have mixed optimism with warnings. He previously said a deal with Iran was “looking very good,” while also stating that military measures remain available if negotiations collapse. Analysts say the administration is trying to balance pressure tactics with diplomacy as oil markets remain sensitive to developments around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian officials have publicly disputed some U.S. claims regarding progress in the talks, signaling that major disagreements still remain. Tehran has demanded stronger guarantees and a permanent end to wartime restrictions, while Washington continues to seek security and nuclear-related concessions. With the ceasefire deadline hours away, global attention is now focused on whether both sides can avoid renewed conflict. Any failure in negotiations could quickly raise tensions again and impact global energy prices, while a successful agreement could stabilize the region and ease market concerns.