Afham

Trump suspected gunman targets

Trump and his officials ‘likely’ targets of suspected gunman, acting attorney general says

Former President Donald Trump and several of his senior officials were described as “likely” targets of a suspected gunman, according to comments made by the acting attorney general during a press briefing. The statement came as investigators continued examining the suspect’s motives, background, and any possible links to extremist ideologies or organized groups. Authorities said the suspect was detained after a coordinated law enforcement operation, with officers recovering multiple weapons, ammunition, and documents that are now being analyzed. Early findings suggest the individual may have been planning attacks against high-profile political figures, with Trump and members of his inner circle among the most prominent names allegedly identified. The acting attorney general emphasized that there is currently no evidence of an immediate wider threat, but security measures around Trump, campaign offices, and current and former government officials have been strengthened as a precaution. Federal agencies, including the FBI and Secret Service, are working together to trace the suspect’s movements, online activity, and communications in the weeks leading up to the arrest. Political violence has become an increasing concern in the United States, with officials from both major parties warning against heated rhetoric and threats aimed at public servants. The latest case is expected to renew debate over domestic extremism, gun access, and the security challenges faced by candidates during election cycles. Trump’s representatives thanked law enforcement agencies for their swift response and said they remain confident in the security systems protecting the former president. They did not comment further on the specifics of the investigation. Legal experts note that prosecutors will likely pursue serious federal charges if evidence confirms a planned attack on political figures. Such offenses can carry lengthy prison sentences and heightened penalties when threats involve former presidents or protected officials. The case remains under active investigation, and officials have urged the public to avoid speculation until verified facts are released. More details are expected as court documents become public in the coming days.

Read More
Trump Pakistan Iran talks

Trump cancels Witkoff and Kushner’s trip to Pakistan for Iran talks

President Donald Trump has canceled a planned trip by envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to Pakistan for discussions linked to the ongoing conflict with Iran, creating fresh uncertainty around diplomatic efforts in the region. The delegation had been expected to travel to Islamabad for indirect negotiations involving Iranian officials and Pakistani intermediaries. Trump said he saw little value in sending negotiators on a lengthy trip when progress appeared limited. In public remarks, he argued the United States held stronger leverage and said Iran could make contact directly if it wanted serious talks. Reports also cited Trump’s frustration with what he described as confusion inside Iran’s leadership structure. The cancellation is being viewed as a setback for hopes of a diplomatic breakthrough after weeks of rising tensions. Pakistan had emerged as a possible neutral venue because of its working ties with both Washington and Tehran. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was already in Islamabad meeting Pakistani leaders, though Tehran reportedly denied that direct U.S.-Iran talks were formally scheduled. The wider crisis continues to affect global markets, particularly energy prices and shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz. Any delay in negotiations could prolong instability and keep investors cautious. Analysts say future talks may still happen through phone diplomacy, regional mediators, or a different host country. For now, the decision highlights how fragile the current ceasefire and negotiation process remains. While Trump insists talks are still possible, canceling the Pakistan mission signals that a quick resolution is far from certain.

Read More
NATO expel members

Nato says ‘no provision’ to expel members after report US could seek to suspend Spain

NATO has said there is “no provision” within its founding treaty to expel member states, following reports that the United States could explore ways to suspend Spain over defense spending disputes. The statement comes amid renewed pressure from Washington on allies to meet military spending commitments. According to alliance officials, the NATO treaty does not contain a mechanism for removing or suspending members once they have joined. Any major institutional changes would likely require unanimous agreement among all member states, making such a move highly unlikely. Reports emerged after growing frustration in the United States regarding burden-sharing within the alliance. Several American officials and lawmakers have repeatedly criticized some European nations for not spending enough on defense, with Spain often cited as one of the lower contributors relative to GDP targets. Spain is a longstanding NATO member and hosts important military facilities used for alliance operations. Spanish officials have defended their contributions, pointing to troop deployments, naval assets, and support for joint missions rather than focusing solely on spending percentages. The issue reflects wider tensions inside NATO as members balance domestic budgets with rising security concerns linked to conflicts in Ukraine and instability in other regions. While calls for greater defense spending continue, diplomats stress unity remains the alliance’s top priority. Analysts say any attempt to sideline Spain would create serious political divisions and distract from collective security goals. For now, NATO has made clear that no formal rule exists to expel members, reinforcing the alliance’s consensus-based structure.

Read More
UK relations

Trump tells BBC that King’s visit could ‘absolutely’ help repair relations with UK

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has said that a future visit hosted by King Charles could “absolutely” help repair relations between the United States and the United Kingdom. Speaking in an interview with the BBC, Trump suggested that the long-standing alliance between the two nations remains strong, but personal diplomacy and symbolic gestures can play an important role in strengthening ties after periods of tension. Trump’s remarks come at a time when UK-US relations are being closely watched over issues including trade, defense cooperation, and global security challenges. He indicated that the British monarchy continues to hold significant soft power and international influence, making a royal visit a meaningful opportunity to reset the tone between leaders. The former president has previously spoken positively about the Royal Family and his past state visits to Britain during his presidency. Trump noted that relations between countries often depend not only on formal negotiations but also on personal respect and public goodwill. A meeting involving King Charles, he argued, could create a more positive atmosphere and encourage closer cooperation. Political analysts say royal diplomacy has historically been used to reinforce Britain’s relationships with major allies. While the monarchy does not set government policy, royal visits often carry symbolic weight and can help smooth political tensions. Trump’s comments highlight how ceremonial events may still influence international relations in practical ways. The United Kingdom remains one of America’s closest partners, with deep economic ties, intelligence sharing, and military cooperation through NATO and other alliances. Any move aimed at improving political chemistry between leaders would likely be welcomed on both sides of the Atlantic. Although no official visit has been announced, Trump’s statement has already sparked discussion about the potential role of King Charles in future diplomacy. As both countries navigate changing global dynamics, gestures of unity and tradition may help preserve one of the world’s most important strategic partnerships. Whether symbolic or substantive, Trump’s comments underline the enduring importance of the special relationship between Washington and London, and how royal engagement could once again become part of that diplomatic story.

Read More
Trump Iran deal pressure

Trump denies being ‘under pressure’ to make Iran deal ahead of ceasefire deadline

U.S. President Donald Trump has denied claims that he is facing pressure to finalize a deal with Iran as the deadline for a temporary ceasefire approaches. Speaking to reporters, Trump insisted negotiations are progressing on Washington’s terms and said he remains confident that Tehran wants an agreement more urgently than the United States does. The ceasefire, brokered earlier this month after weeks of heightened tensions, is set to expire on April 22 unless both sides agree to extend it or reach a broader settlement. Trump rejected suggestions that the White House is rushing to secure a diplomatic breakthrough, saying he is under “no pressure whatsoever” and that the U.S. has multiple options if talks fail. Recent comments from Trump have mixed optimism with warnings. He previously said a deal with Iran was “looking very good,” while also stating that military measures remain available if negotiations collapse. Analysts say the administration is trying to balance pressure tactics with diplomacy as oil markets remain sensitive to developments around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian officials have publicly disputed some U.S. claims regarding progress in the talks, signaling that major disagreements still remain. Tehran has demanded stronger guarantees and a permanent end to wartime restrictions, while Washington continues to seek security and nuclear-related concessions. With the ceasefire deadline hours away, global attention is now focused on whether both sides can avoid renewed conflict. Any failure in negotiations could quickly raise tensions again and impact global energy prices, while a successful agreement could stabilize the region and ease market concerns.

Read More
US negotiators Pakistan Iran talks

US negotiators to return to Pakistan for talks as Trump repeats threat to Iran’s infrastructure

U.S. negotiators are expected to return to Pakistan for another round of talks aimed at easing tensions with Iran, as President Donald Trump repeated threats against Iranian infrastructure if diplomacy fails. The planned discussions are reportedly set to take place in Islamabad, with senior American officials expected to attend. According to multiple reports, Trump said the United States is offering what he described as a “fair and reasonable deal,” but warned that if Iran rejects the proposal, Washington could target bridges, power plants, and other critical facilities. The remarks have added pressure to already fragile negotiations and raised concerns about further escalation in the region. Iran has not officially confirmed its participation in the new talks. State-linked media reports indicated Tehran remains unhappy with U.S. demands and the ongoing naval blockade affecting Iranian ports. Iranian officials have argued that continued economic and military pressure undermines trust needed for successful diplomacy. The diplomatic push comes as the Strait of Hormuz remains a major flashpoint. Iran recently tightened shipping restrictions again after briefly easing them, disrupting one of the world’s most important oil transit routes. Global energy markets are closely watching developments, as any prolonged disruption could affect fuel prices worldwide. Pakistan has emerged as a key mediator in the crisis, hosting previous meetings between both sides. Whether the latest talks produce a breakthrough remains uncertain, but the renewed effort suggests both Washington and Tehran still see diplomacy as preferable to a wider conflict

Read More
Strait of Hormuz attacks

Ships report attacks after Iran closes Strait of Hormuz, as Trump says US ‘won’t be blackmailed’

Ships crossing the strategic Strait of Hormuz have reported multiple attacks after Iran announced a renewed closure of the vital waterway, sharply escalating tensions in the Gulf. Maritime security agencies said tankers and commercial vessels near the strait faced gunfire and suspicious projectile incidents, though early reports indicated crews were safe. The latest developments have raised fears of a wider disruption to global shipping and oil supplies. Iran said the strait had returned to its “previous state” and would remain under strict military control, blaming a continuing U.S. blockade and accusing Washington of maritime aggression. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints, handling a large share of global crude oil exports. Any prolonged closure could trigger higher fuel prices and supply chain pressure worldwide. President Donald Trump responded forcefully, saying the United States “won’t be blackmailed” by Iran and insisting American naval operations would continue. He also claimed talks with Tehran were still possible, suggesting diplomacy had not fully collapsed despite the renewed crisis. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center reported further suspicious activity near the strait, while several governments closely monitored vessel movements. Analysts warn that even isolated attacks can cause insurers to raise shipping premiums, forcing some carriers to avoid the route altogether. Oil markets are expected to remain volatile as traders assess whether the confrontation is temporary or the start of a longer standoff. If hostilities intensify, the Strait of Hormuz attacks could become a major flashpoint affecting both regional security and the global economy.

Read More
Strait of Hormuz open

Iran says Strait of Hormuz is ‘open’ as Trump says US blockade will continue until deal reached

Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz is open for commercial shipping, signaling a possible easing of tensions in one of the world’s most critical energy routes. The statement came as U.S. President Donald Trump said the American naval blockade targeting Iran would remain in place until a final agreement is reached with Tehran. The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which a large share of global oil and gas shipments pass each day. Any disruption in the route can quickly affect international energy markets, shipping costs, and fuel prices worldwide. Iran’s move to reopen the passage was welcomed by traders, with oil prices reportedly falling after the announcement. Trump said the waterway was “ready for full passage,” but clarified that U.S. restrictions on Iranian ports and vessels would stay active until negotiations are fully completed. The White House appears to be using continued economic and naval pressure as leverage to secure a broader diplomatic settlement. Despite the reopening, uncertainty remains. Some reports indicate ships may still need coordination with Iranian authorities for safe passage, while military vessels remain restricted. Shipping companies are also cautious because of earlier security threats, including mines and tanker attacks during the recent conflict. The development is being viewed as a tentative step toward de-escalation after weeks of conflict and disruption in the Gulf region. However, analysts warn that without a full political agreement between Washington and Tehran, tensions could rise again quickly. For global markets, the key issue now is whether commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz returns to normal levels and whether ongoing talks can produce a lasting deal. Until then, the region remains a major geopolitical flashpoint.

Read More
Israel Lebanon ceasefire

Trump says Israel and Lebanon to begin 10-day ceasefire within hours

U.S. President Donald Trump announced that Israel and Lebanon have agreed to begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours, marking a potentially significant pause in the latest cross-border conflict. According to Trump, the temporary truce is set to start at 5 p.m. Eastern Time after what he described as “excellent conversations” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. The proposed ceasefire comes after weeks of heightened military tensions involving Israeli strikes in Lebanon and retaliatory attacks linked to Hezbollah. The conflict has increased fears of a broader regional escalation, especially amid ongoing instability across the Middle East. Analysts say even a short-term halt in fighting could provide an opportunity for humanitarian aid deliveries and diplomatic talks. Trump also said he has directed senior U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, to work with both sides toward a more lasting peace arrangement. He indicated that leaders from Israel and Lebanon could be invited to Washington for future discussions if the ceasefire holds. While the announcement has drawn cautious optimism, questions remain over whether all armed groups involved will fully comply. Hezbollah had not immediately issued formal confirmation at the time of the announcement, and previous ceasefires in the region have often faced violations soon after taking effect. International observers say the next 10 days will be crucial. If the ceasefire is respected, it could open the door to wider negotiations on border security, military disengagement, and long-term regional stability. If it collapses, however, the risk of renewed violence would remain high. The Israel Lebanon ceasefire announcement is already being seen as an important diplomatic test for the Trump administration’s Middle East strategy.

Read More
Trump Iran talks resume blockade ships turned back

Trump says Iran talks could resume ‘over next two days’ as US says ships turned back by blockade

U.S. President Donald Trump has indicated that negotiations with Iran could resume “over the next two days,” even as tensions remain high following the implementation of a U.S. naval blockade targeting Iranian ports. The statement suggests a possible diplomatic reopening despite ongoing military pressure in the region. The blockade, enforced by U.S. Central Command, has already begun to impact maritime activity. According to U.S. officials, several merchant vessels have been forced to turn back after approaching Iranian ports, signaling early compliance with the restrictions. In the first 24 hours alone, at least six ships reportedly reversed course under U.S. direction, highlighting the immediate effectiveness of the operation. Trump has framed the blockade as a leverage tool designed to push Iran back to the negotiating table. His claim that talks could resume soon indicates that Washington is pursuing a dual-track approach—combining military enforcement with renewed diplomatic outreach. The involvement of intermediaries such as Pakistan is also seen as a key factor in facilitating potential discussions. However, the situation remains fragile. The blockade follows the collapse of earlier peace talks and represents a significant escalation in the conflict. It is aimed at restricting Iran’s economic lifelines, particularly its oil exports, but carries risks of retaliation and further destabilization. Iran has warned that continued pressure could provoke countermeasures, while global markets remain sensitive to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for energy supplies. Despite the show of force, analysts caution that the blockade alone may not guarantee a diplomatic breakthrough. Ultimately, Trump’s remarks signal cautious optimism about restarting talks, but the broader situation remains tense. The coming days will be crucial in determining whether diplomacy can regain momentum or if the standoff deepens further.

Read More