US Archives - Page 3 of 9

Trump says ‘everything’s been knocked out in Iran’ as he criticises UK and Starmer

US President Donald Trump claimed on Tuesday that US-Israeli military operations have inflicted “virtually everything … knocked out” of Iran’s defence capabilities, asserting that Iran’s navy, air force, radar and air-defence systems have been disabled amid escalating conflict in the Middle East. Trump made the remarks in the Oval Office during a press session with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, defending the strikes as necessary to pre-empt what he described as an imminent threat from Iran. He denied that Israel had forced the United States into war, insisting that he acted to prevent a potentially planned Iranian attack on the United States. Trump admitted uncertainty about Iran’s post-conflict leadership and acknowledged the absence of a clear “day-after” plan. Trump’s comments came amid soaring tensions with European allies, particularly the UK. He openly criticised UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, saying he was “not happy with the UK” and that Starmer was “not Winston Churchill” for initially resisting US requests to use British military bases in support of offensive operations against Iran. Trump said Starmer had been “very uncooperative” and lamented that the “special relationship” between the US and UK was “not what it was,” highlighting London’s hesitancy over involvement and legal concerns. Starmer later allowed limited UK base use for defensive strikes against Iranian missile infrastructure but stopped short of broader offensive participation. The diplomatic spat underscores the growing strain between Washington and London as the Middle East conflict deepens. While Trump’s narrative emphasises military success, critics question both the legality and strategic planning of the campaign, and allies like Starmer have insisted on adherence to international law and careful strategic considerations.

Israeli attacks kill 31 in Lebanon, Iran strikes across region, and US warplanes crash in Kuwait

Afham2 months ago2 months ago03 mins

Israeli military forces carried out intense airstrikes across southern Lebanon, hitting Hezbollah-controlled areas including the southern suburbs of Beirut, the Bekaa Valley, and zones near Tyre, in response to a barrage of missiles and drones launched by the Iran-aligned group toward northern Israel. At least 31 people were killed and scores injured, according to Lebanon’s health authorities, as residential and militant positions were struck. Israeli officials said they targeted senior Hezbollah figures and infrastructure, and warned civilians to evacuate from frontline areas. The broader conflict stems from a joint US-Israeli offensive on Iran after the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, which triggered massive Iranian retaliation across the Middle East. Tehran’s Revolutionary Guards launched missiles and drones at Israeli territory, Gulf states, and Western military installations. Regional capitals including Kuwait City, Riyadh, Doha, Abu Dhabi, and Manama reported incoming strikes, damage to airports and oil infrastructure, and civilian casualties. Multiple Gulf airspaces were closed, prompting thousands of flight cancellations and delays. Amid the ongoing hostilities, the Kuwait Ministry of Defence confirmed that several US warplanes crashed on Kuwaiti soil during operations. While exact causes remain unclear, all crew members survived and were reported in stable condition. The incidents underline the high operational tempo and risks faced by coalition air missions in contested airspace. The expanding violence has not only intensified Lebanon’s front but also raised alarm across the Gulf, with diplomatic protests and regional powers bracing for further retaliation. Civilian displacement and international transit disruptions are escalating alongside military confrontations.

Russian soldiers tell BBC they saw fellow troops executed on commanders’ orders

Afham2 months ago2 months ago03 mins

Reports from Russian soldiers claiming they witnessed fellow troops being executed on commanders’ orders have raised serious allegations about battlefield discipline and potential war crimes during the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. In interviews with BBC, several servicemen described incidents in which soldiers accused of retreating or refusing orders were allegedly shot by their own side. The accounts, while difficult to independently verify, add to a growing body of testimony suggesting harsh enforcement tactics within parts of the Russian military structure. According to the soldiers, some executions were carried out as warnings to others, particularly during intense fighting when units were under pressure to hold positions. One interviewee claimed that commanders framed such actions as necessary to maintain order and prevent panic among troops facing Ukrainian advances. These statements, if accurate, could indicate violations of international humanitarian law, which prohibits extrajudicial killings and summary executions. Authorities in Russia have not publicly acknowledged the allegations and have repeatedly denied accusations of misconduct by their forces. Meanwhile, officials in Ukraine argue that the testimonies reflect systemic problems within Russian command structures, including poor morale and coercive discipline measures. Independent human rights investigators have previously documented claims of abuse, though confirming incidents in active combat zones remains challenging. The allegations come amid continued scrutiny of Russia’s military leadership and strategy under President Vladimir Putin, as the war enters another prolonged phase with heavy casualties reported on both sides. Analysts note that internal discipline problems often emerge in prolonged conflicts, particularly where communication breakdowns and logistical shortages create stress within units. WABS TALK If corroborated, the claims could increase international calls for investigations into potential war crimes and accountability mechanisms related to the conflict. However, experts caution that testimonies alone are not sufficient proof and require independent verification through forensic evidence and multiple sources. US wants Russia and Ukraine to end war by June, says Zelensky

Near impossible’ travel conditions in New York as 22 inches of snow falls on US east coast

Afham2 months ago2 months ago03 mins

A powerful nor’easter has paralyzed New York and much of the U.S. East Coast, dumping nearly 22 inches of snow across the region. The storm, described as one of the most severe in recent years, has created near impossible travel conditions. Authorities have declared a state of emergency, urging residents to remain indoors as blizzard-like winds and heavy snowfall continue to batter the area. Roads across New York City and surrounding states are buried under thick layers of snow, forcing officials to impose a travel ban. Only emergency and essential vehicles are permitted, while public transportation services face widespread disruptions. Airports have been hit especially hard, with thousands of flights canceled at JFK, LaGuardia, Newark, and Boston Logan, leaving travelers stranded and air traffic at a standstill. Residents are experiencing power outages as strong winds topple trees and damage utility lines. Local businesses, schools, and government offices remain closed, while grocery stores and pharmacies are struggling to keep up with demand as people stockpile essentials. The storm has also impacted neighboring states, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts, where snowfall totals are similarly extreme. Meteorologists warn that conditions may worsen as the storm continues to intensify, with blowing snow reducing visibility to near zero in many areas. Emergency services are stretched thin, responding to stranded motorists, medical emergencies, and infrastructure damage. Officials emphasize that staying indoors is the safest option until the storm subsides. This historic snowfall highlights the vulnerability of major urban centers to extreme winter weather. With near impossible travel conditions in New York, the storm serves as a reminder of the importance of preparedness and resilience in the face of natural disasters.

Trump raises global tariffs to 15%, day after Supreme Court ruling

Afham2 months ago2 months ago03 mins

In a dramatic policy shift, President Donald Trump announced a global tariff increase to 15%, just one day after a pivotal Supreme Court ruling. This decision marks one of the most significant escalations in trade policy in recent years, with wide‑ranging implications for international commerce, domestic industries, and global markets. The tariff hike is aimed at strengthening U.S. manufacturing and reducing reliance on foreign imports. By raising duties across multiple categories, the administration seeks to encourage domestic production and protect American jobs. However, economists warn that such sweeping measures could trigger retaliatory actions from trading partners, potentially sparking new rounds of trade disputes. Global businesses are bracing for higher costs, particularly in sectors like technology, automotive, and consumer goods. Importers will face increased expenses, which may be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. Meanwhile, exporters in countries heavily dependent on U.S. markets are expected to feel immediate pressure, as competitiveness declines under the new tariff regime. The timing of the announcement—coming directly after a Supreme Court ruling—has added political weight to the decision. Analysts suggest that the ruling provided legal backing for broader executive authority in trade matters, paving the way for this aggressive tariff expansion. While supporters argue that the move will bolster national security and economic independence, critics caution that it risks destabilizing global supply chains and undermining long‑standing trade relationships. The coming weeks will reveal how international markets and governments respond to this bold step, and whether negotiations can ease tensions or escalate into a full‑scale trade conflict

Trump says world has 10 days to see if Iran deal reached

Afham2 months ago2 months ago03 mins

Donald Trump has said the world has roughly 10 days to determine whether a new agreement can be reached with Iran, warning that failure to secure a deal could lead to serious consequences, including potential military escalation. His remarks come as tensions rise over Tehran’s nuclear program and ongoing diplomatic efforts involving the United States and international partners. Speaking after recent negotiations, Trump described the discussions as “productive but complicated,” emphasizing that Washington is seeking a comprehensive agreement that would permanently prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. He stressed that any deal must include strict limitations on uranium enrichment, expanded international inspections, and constraints on Iran’s missile development capabilities. According to Trump, previous diplomatic frameworks were inadequate, and the new proposal must deliver stronger guarantees. Indirect talks between American and Iranian officials have reportedly taken place in Geneva, where mediators are attempting to bridge longstanding disagreements. Iran continues to maintain that its nuclear activities are intended for civilian energy purposes, while rejecting demands to scale back certain defense programs it considers essential to national sovereignty. These conflicting positions remain a major obstacle to a breakthrough. Meanwhile, the United States has increased its military readiness in the Middle East, deploying additional naval and air assets to the region. Analysts view the buildup as both a pressure tactic in negotiations and a contingency measure should diplomacy fail. The possibility of confrontation has raised global concern, with several governments urging restraint and renewed diplomatic engagement to avoid a wider conflict. Despite his warning, Trump reiterated that his preferred outcome is a peaceful resolution. However, his 10-day timeframe underscores the urgency of the situation and signals that the coming days could be decisive for regional stability and international security.

Difficult’ Russia-Ukraine peace talks end without breakthrough

Afham2 months ago2 months ago02 mins

The latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks concluded in Geneva without delivering any meaningful progress toward ending the ongoing war. Over two days of negotiations, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the discussions as “difficult,” accusing Moscow of deliberately stalling the process. The talks, mediated by U.S. envoys, were expected to explore pathways toward a ceasefire and long-term settlement, but they ended abruptly after less than two hours on the second day. Ukrainian officials stressed their commitment to pursuing peace but voiced frustration at Russia’s reluctance to engage constructively. Zelensky emphasized that Kyiv’s delegation had been tasked with maximizing opportunities for peaceful solutions, yet Moscow appeared intent on dragging out negotiations. The Kremlin, meanwhile, maintained its position that Ukraine must make concessions, particularly regarding territorial disputes, which remain the central obstacle to progress. The Geneva talks were part of a U.S.-brokered initiative aimed at reducing tensions and finding common ground. Despite international pressure, both sides left without agreeing on concrete steps forward. Analysts highlight that the failure underscores the complexity of achieving a ceasefire, given the entrenched military and political positions. With the fourth anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion approaching, the lack of progress raises concerns about prolonged instability in Europe. Observers warn that continued stalemate could deepen humanitarian crises and further destabilize regional security. While the talks ended without breakthrough, both sides acknowledged that dialogue must continue, leaving open the possibility of future negotiations.

World’s rules-based order ‘no longer exists’, Germany’s Merz warns

Afham2 months ago2 months ago03 mins

Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz has warned that the world’s rules-based international order is effectively collapsing, arguing that long-standing norms governing global security, trade, and diplomacy are under unprecedented strain. Speaking amid escalating geopolitical tensions, Merz said that principles once considered foundational—respect for sovereignty, multilateral cooperation, and adherence to international law—are increasingly being ignored or selectively applied. Merz pointed to ongoing conflicts, strategic rivalries between major powers, and weakening global institutions as evidence that the post–World War II framework is fragmenting. He emphasized that institutions such as the United Nations and global trade bodies were designed to prevent unilateral aggression and economic coercion, yet enforcement mechanisms have struggled to keep pace with contemporary challenges. The German leader stressed that Europe must adapt to this new reality. He argued that reliance on established alliances and diplomatic conventions is no longer sufficient in a world where power politics is resurgent. According to Merz, European nations must strengthen their defense capabilities, reduce strategic dependencies, and pursue a more unified foreign policy stance to safeguard their interests. Merz also highlighted economic vulnerabilities, noting that supply chain disruptions, energy security concerns, and the weaponization of trade have exposed weaknesses in globalization. He called for a recalibration of economic partnerships to prioritize resilience alongside openness. Despite his stark assessment, Merz maintained that abandoning the concept of a rules-based system is not an option. Instead, he urged democratic nations to recommit to shared values and actively defend international norms. Without coordinated action, he warned, instability could become the defining feature of global politics. His remarks reflect growing anxiety across Europe that the global order underpinning decades of relative stability is eroding, leaving nations to navigate a more unpredictable and competitive geopolitical landscape.

Palestinians say new Israeli measures in West Bank amount to de facto annexation

Afham2 months ago1 month ago03 mins

Palestinian officials and civil society groups say a series of new Israeli measures in the occupied West Bank amount to de facto annexation, warning that recent actions are permanently reshaping the territory’s political and geographic reality. The measures include expanded settlement activity, tighter military controls, and administrative changes that critics argue undermine any future Palestinian state. According to Palestinian authorities, Israel has accelerated approval of new housing units in Jewish settlements while simultaneously restricting Palestinian construction and land access. Large areas of the West Bank have reportedly been redesignated as closed military zones or nature reserves, limiting Palestinian movement and agricultural use. Palestinians say these steps consolidate Israeli control without a formal declaration of annexation. Recent changes in governance have intensified concerns. Israeli officials have transferred additional administrative powers over the West Bank from the military to civilian authorities, a move Palestinians argue blurs the line between occupation and sovereignty. Human rights groups say this shift signals a long-term strategy to integrate the territory into Israel while denying Palestinians equal rights. The Israeli government maintains that its actions are driven by security needs and legal considerations, rejecting claims of annexation. Israeli officials argue that settlement expansion is limited and that final borders should be determined through negotiations. However, peace talks have been stalled for years, and Palestinians say facts on the ground are making a negotiated solution increasingly unrealistic. International reaction has been cautious but critical. Several governments have expressed concern that Israeli policies threaten the viability of a two-state solution. Palestinian leaders warn that continued settlement growth and land reclassification could lead to increased instability and resentment in the region. As tensions rise, Palestinians say the cumulative effect of these measures is clear: even without formal legislation, Israel is entrenching permanent control over large parts of the West Bank, fundamentally altering the prospects for peace. WABS TALK EU adds Iran’s Revolutionary Guards to terrorist list.

Japan’s governing party on course for landslide election win

Afham2 months ago1 month ago03 mins

Japan’s governing party is on course for a landslide election win, according to early projections and political analysts, reinforcing Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s mandate at a time of domestic reform and regional uncertainty. The result signals strong voter preference for stability, continuity in economic policy, and a firm approach to national security amid rising geopolitical tensions in East Asia. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has dominated Japanese politics for much of the post-war era, is expected to secure a commanding majority in the lower house. Exit polls suggest the party has outperformed expectations across both urban and rural constituencies, benefiting from a fragmented opposition and relatively high voter confidence in the government’s crisis management record. The LDP’s coalition partner is also projected to retain most of its seats, further strengthening the ruling bloc. Economic concerns played a central role in shaping voter sentiment. While Japan continues to face challenges such as inflationary pressures, a weak yen, and demographic decline, the government’s promises of wage growth, corporate reform, and long-term fiscal stability appear to have resonated with the electorate. Voters also rewarded the ruling party for maintaining steady governance during a period of global economic volatility. Security policy was another decisive factor. The government’s commitment to strengthening defense capabilities and deepening alliances, particularly with the United States and regional partners, appealed to voters wary of growing security risks in the Asia-Pacific region. The opposition struggled to present a unified alternative vision on these issues, diluting its electoral impact. A landslide victory would give the prime minister greater political capital to push forward contentious reforms, including tax restructuring, social security adjustments, and labor market changes. However, analysts caution that a strong mandate also raises expectations, and the government will face increased pressure to deliver tangible results in the months ahead. WABS TALK EU adds Iran’s Revolutionary Guards to terrorist list.