Wabsnews Archives - Page 6 of 9

Zelensky warns against giving away territory as latest Ukraine talks end

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has issued a firm warning against any proposals that involve surrendering territory to Russia, as the latest round of diplomatic discussions concluded without major breakthroughs. Speaking after the talks, Zelensky emphasized that Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity are non-negotiable, underscoring that no peace plan can succeed if it compromises the nation’s internationally recognized borders. The talks, which brought together Ukrainian officials and a coalition of international mediators, focused on exploring new frameworks for a potential ceasefire and long-term security guarantees. While some participants suggested considering territorial concessions as part of a broader compromise, Kyiv firmly rejected this approach. Zelensky stressed that accepting such terms would not only undermine Ukraine’s future security but also set a dangerous precedent for global norms surrounding territorial aggression. Despite the lack of concrete progress, diplomats described the negotiations as “constructive,” noting that all sides remain committed to pursuing a peaceful resolution. Ukraine reiterated that any sustainable peace agreement must include the full withdrawal of Russian forces, the return of all occupied regions, and binding security assurances to prevent future escalations. Zelensky also called on international partners to maintain strong political and military support for Ukraine, warning that weakening assistance would embolden Russian aggression and prolong the conflict. He highlighted the importance of unity among allies, especially as winter approaches and fighting continues on multiple fronts. While the talks ended without major advancements, the Ukrainian government said discussions would continue in the coming weeks. For Kyiv, the stance remains clear: peace is possible, but not at the cost of territorial loss or national sovereignty.

Nigeria sees one of worst mass abductions as 315 taken from school

Afham5 months ago5 months ago04 mins

Nigeria is facing one of its most devastating mass abductions in years after 315 people — including 303 students and 12 teachers — were seized from St. Mary’s Catholic Primary and Secondary School in the Papiri community of Niger State. The attack, carried out by heavily armed gunmen in the early hours, has renewed nationwide alarm over the persistent vulnerability of schools amid rising insecurity. The gunmen reportedly arrived in large numbers, overwhelming the limited security presence before storming classrooms and staff quarters. Many students attempted to flee into nearby bushes, but dozens were later confirmed to be among those abducted, raising the total number well above initial estimates. Local authorities and community leaders described the abduction as one of the largest school kidnappings ever recorded in the country, surpassing several high-profile incidents from previous years. The Christian Association of Nigeria confirmed the updated figure of 315 abducted after a detailed headcount, noting that some early reports had underestimated how many students were missing. Out of 629 enrolled students at the school, nearly half were taken, underscoring the scale of the crisis and the attackers’ ability to operate with impunity. The abduction follows another major kidnapping just days earlier, in which 25 girls were taken from a secondary school in Kebbi State. The back-to-back incidents have heightened fear across northern Nigeria and prompted authorities in nearby states to order emergency school closures as a precaution. The surge in violence has also pressured the federal government to reassess its security strategies, as armed groups increasingly target educational institutions for ransom or political leverage. President Bola Tinubu cancelled planned international commitments to address the crisis, directing military, police, and local security forces to conduct an intensive rescue operation across forests surrounding the area. Security personnel have reportedly launched coordinated searches, but large-scale abductions in remote regions often pose significant challenges due to difficult terrain and the mobility of the armed groups responsible. Community leaders have appealed for calm but expressed frustration over what they describe as recurring lapses in intelligence and protection for rural schools. The Christian Association of Nigeria urged the public to avoid circulating misinformation, dismissing claims that the school received prior warnings as false and harmful. Civil-society organizations, including major child-rights groups, have renewed calls for stronger national policies to protect schoolchildren, stressing that attacks on educational facilities have become disturbingly routine. The mass abduction in Niger State stands as a stark reminder of the insecurity gripping parts of the country. As families await news of their loved ones, the incident highlights the urgent need for sustained security reforms, improved community protection, and a strengthened commitment to safeguarding children — especially in regions where schools have increasingly become targets.

Zelensky ready to work with US on ‘their vision’ for ending Ukraine war

Afham5 months ago5 months ago04 mins

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has signaled a willingness to engage closely with Washington on a U.S.-backed peace proposal, describing his approach as “constructive, honest and prompt.” Following a meeting in Kyiv with U.S. Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, Zelensky affirmed that Ukrainian and American teams would collaboratively work on the key elements of the plan. Although the full details of the 28-point plan have not been publicly disclosed, reports suggest it contains highly sensitive terms — including territorial concessions, military restrictions, and a new security architecture. According to media coverage, some of the most controversial proposals would require Ukraine to cede control over the Donbas region, formally recognize Russian control over Crimea, Luhansk, and Donetsk, and limit its army to 600,000 troops. In exchange, Ukraine would receive “robust security guarantees,” though the exact form and enforceability of those guarantees remain unclear. For Zelensky, agreeing to negotiate does not mean blind capitulation. His office says that while he has accepted a draft, he has also “outlined the fundamental principles that matter to our people.” He frames the collaboration as essential for a “just peace that respects everyone’s sovereignty, a durable peace that can’t be called into question by future aggression.” This willingness to engage has stirred strong reactions. Several European allies have pushed back, warning that the U.S.-proposed plan could amount to a forced surrender of Ukrainian land and resources. Critics argue that such terms might undermine Ukraine’s long-term security and set a dangerous precedent for capitulation-style diplomacy. Still, Zelensky appears determined enough to explore diplomacy. His team plans to hold further discussions not only with U.S. officials but also with other international leaders. According to his office, as part of upcoming diplomacy, Zelensky expects to engage with former U.S. President Donald Trump to explore key diplomatic pathways. How Tommy Hilfiger Became an Overnight Success | Perception Hack | Genius | Secret Zelensky’s outreach underscores a realistic — albeit risky — gamble: he hopes that by aligning with the U.S. vision of peace, Ukraine can secure a deal that prevents future Russian aggression while preserving core national interests. At the same time, he is balancing a fragile relationship — negotiating under pressure from Western allies, wary of concessions, and on a war footing that demands both vigilance and flexibility. Children among 25 killed in one of Russia’s deadliest strikes on western Ukraine

Feud erupts between Trump and ally Marjorie Taylor Greene ahead of Epstein files vote

Afham5 months ago04 mins

A fresh political rift has opened between former U.S. President Donald Trump and one of his most vocal allies, Marjorie Taylor Greene, just days before a high-stakes congressional vote on the release of newly compiled Epstein files. The clash—unexpected given Greene’s long-standing loyalty to Trump—has injected new tension into Republican ranks as lawmakers prepare for what could become one of the most politically explosive disclosures in years. The feud reportedly began after Greene publicly urged full and immediate transparency regarding the Epstein documents, calling on Trump to support a broad, unredacted release. She argued that the American public deserves “every single name, every visitor, every associate and every official” tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s network. Her remarks were widely shared online and interpreted as a challenge to Trump’s more cautious stance. Trump, speaking to reporters, criticized Greene for what he described as “reckless pressure” that could lead to the release of unverified or politically motivated information. According to advisers, he favours a phased disclosure overseen by independent reviewers to avoid what he termed a “witch-hunt environment.” Trump also suggested that some Republicans were trying to weaponize the moment for personal branding—comments broadly seen as aimed at Greene. Greene, never one to sidestep confrontation, fired back during a conservative radio appearance, insisting that “America has been lied to long enough” and that any hesitation to release the files in full raises “questions of motive.” While she did not mention Trump by name, her implication that political interests were obstructing transparency escalated tensions dramatically. The dispute comes at a critical juncture for Congress, where bipartisan support has been growing for the full declassification of Epstein-related evidence. Lawmakers are expected to vote later this week on whether to compel the release of hundreds of pages of documents, flight logs, visitor entries, correspondence records and newly gathered materials from previously sealed investigations. The vote is shaping up to be one of the most watched and debated decisions of the year. Within the Republican Party, reactions to the Trump-Greene feud have been mixed. Some conservative allies have rallied behind Greene’s push for aggressive transparency, arguing that the party should champion accountability across all political and social circles. Others have sided with Trump, warning that releasing unvetted information could unleash baseless accusations with long-lasting political fallout. As both sides entrench their positions, the political temperature is rising. Whether the feud is a brief flare-up or the start of a deeper rift may depend on how the Epstein files vote unfolds—and how much political damage the disclosures ultimately inflict.

Trump says he will take legal action against BBC over Panorama edit

Afham5 months ago5 months ago05 mins

Donald Trump has announced that he will pursue legal action against the BBC, accusing the broadcaster of defamation after what he describes as a deceptive and damaging edit of his January 6, 2021 speech in a recent Panorama documentary. Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump confirmed that he intends to file the lawsuit “sometime next week,” adding that he is seeking between $1 billion and $5 billion in compensation. His lawyer, Alejandro Brito, previously sent the BBC a letter demanding a full retraction, a public apology, and significant financial damages. The controversy centers on the Panorama episode titled “Trump: A Second Chance?”, which aired shortly before the 2024 U.S. election. The documentary used excerpts from Trump’s January 6 speech, but critics say the program spliced together lines from different parts of the address, making it appear as though Trump called on supporters to “fight like hell” as they moved toward the Capitol. In reality, the statements were made nearly an hour apart, and key segments in which Trump urged protesters to remain peaceful were omitted. These editorial choices prompted accusations that the documentary created a misleading narrative about Trump’s intentions on the day of the Capitol riot. Following the outcry, the BBC issued an apology, with its chair Samir Shah describing the edit as an “error of judgment.” The broadcaster also confirmed that it would not rebroadcast the documentary in its existing form. However, despite acknowledging the editing mistake, the BBC rejected Trump’s request for damages, arguing that there is no legal basis for a defamation claim of the scale he is pursuing. Trump has remained firm in his stance, insisting that he feels an “obligation” to proceed with the lawsuit. He argues that media organizations should be held accountable when they distort or manipulate his words. He publicly described the Panorama edit as a “corrupt” example of fake news designed to misrepresent his message and influence public perception. The fallout from the incident has already been significant. Two high-profile BBC executives—Director-General Tim Davie and News Chief Deborah Turness—have resigned amid the ongoing scandal, reflecting both internal and external pressure over the handling of the documentary. Despite Trump’s determination, legal experts have expressed skepticism about the viability of the lawsuit. Questions have been raised regarding the statute of limitations under UK defamation law, as well as the complexities of pursuing such a claim in U.S. courts. Nevertheless, Trump continues to frame the dispute as part of his broader battle against what he views as longstanding media bias, reinforcing his narrative that major news outlets frequently distort his rhetoric. This planned lawsuit is the latest escalation in Trump’s ongoing clash with mainstream media organizations and underscores his intent to confront those he believes have misrepresented him.

Trump celebrates as Democrats face fallout from end of shutdown

Afham5 months ago5 months ago04 mins

Former President Donald Trump has declared victory following the abrupt end of the U.S. government shutdown, framing the outcome as a political setback for Democrats and a reaffirmation of his influence over national politics. The shutdown, which lasted 12 days, ended after Congress passed a bipartisan funding measure to keep the government open through the fiscal year. However, the political repercussions have begun to surface, with Democrats facing internal divisions and criticism over how they managed the crisis. Trump, speaking at a rally in Ohio, described the resolution as proof that Democrats had “no strategy, no leadership, and no message.” He argued that the party’s failure to secure any significant policy wins during the shutdown demonstrated what he called “a complete collapse of the radical left’s agenda.” Supporters at the rally cheered as Trump claimed the standoff had strengthened his image as a dealmaker capable of pressuring opponents to concede. Inside the Democratic Party, frustration has reportedly grown among lawmakers and strategists. Progressives criticized party leaders for agreeing to reopen the government without achieving key objectives, such as expanded funding for social programs or immigration reforms. Moderate Democrats, meanwhile, have urged a shift toward pragmatic negotiation rather than confrontation, fearing that prolonged shutdowns could alienate independent voters ahead of the next election cycle. Political analysts suggest the episode could deepen the divide between progressive and centrist factions within the Democratic Party. Several commentators noted that while Republicans also faced public backlash during the early days of the shutdown, the resolution’s outcome has allowed Trump to reshape the narrative, portraying himself as the figure who brought Washington back to order. The White House has capitalized on the moment, releasing statements crediting Trump with “restoring stability and accountability.” Administration officials have emphasized that the president’s stance during negotiations reflected his broader campaign promise to protect taxpayers from what he calls “reckless Democratic spending.” On Capitol Hill, some Democrats have attempted to downplay the perceived loss, insisting that reopening the government was necessary to protect federal workers and prevent further economic disruption. Yet, privately, aides acknowledge that the episode has left the party searching for a clearer messaging strategy. As Trump continues to dominate headlines and shape the post-shutdown political narrative, Democrats are now turning their focus toward repairing internal unity and preparing for upcoming budget debates. The shutdown’s end may have restored government operations, but it also reignited questions about leadership, strategy, and the shifting balance of power in Washington.

Elon Musk’s $1tn pay deal approved by Tesla shareholders

Afham6 months ago6 months ago05 mins

At Tesla’s annual shareholders meeting in Austin, Texas, more than 75% of shareholders voted in favour of a new compensation plan for Elon Musk. The package, potentially worth up to around $1 trillion, would be the largest corporate CEO compensation award ever if all performance conditions are achieved. The deal is structured largely as stock-based incentives rather than a fixed salary, linking Musk’s potential earnings to Tesla’s long-term performance. If successful, Musk’s ownership stake in Tesla could increase from roughly 13% to about 25%, further cementing his control over the company. Key Performance Conditions The massive payout depends on Tesla achieving a series of ambitious goals over the coming years. These include reaching a market capitalization of about $8.5 trillion, delivering 20 million vehicles annually, and deploying 1 million robotaxis alongside selling 1 million humanoid robots, such as Tesla’s “Optimus” models. Additionally, Tesla must record sustained annual profits in the hundreds of billions of dollars and Musk must remain as CEO for a defined period while guiding the company through these milestones. Why Supporters Backed It Supporters argue that Musk is the driving force behind Tesla’s transformation from an electric carmaker to a broader AI and robotics powerhouse. They believe the plan aligns Musk’s personal incentives with Tesla’s long-term growth rather than short-term profit. For many investors, the potential benefits justify the risk. Musk’s proven record with Tesla, SpaceX, and other ventures gives confidence that he can push the company toward extraordinary achievements in automation, energy, and self-driving technology. Why It’s Controversial Despite the strong vote in favour, the deal has attracted significant criticism. The sheer scale of the potential payout—$1 trillion—has been labelled excessive by critics who question its fairness and impact on corporate governance. Some institutional investors and governance experts warned that such a plan could dilute shareholder value and place too much power in the hands of a single individual. Sceptics also argue that achieving all the performance targets is unlikely. Tesla faces mounting challenges, including intensifying EV competition, slowing demand, supply chain risks, and regulatory scrutiny. Entrusting so much influence to one figure raises concerns about oversight and succession planning. What This Means Going Forward If Musk meets all conditions, he could become the first person in history to receive a corporate payout of this magnitude, potentially making him the world’s first trillionaire. For Tesla, it represents a daring bet on future dominance across multiple sectors—EVs, robotics, and AI. The vote signals strong investor faith in Musk’s leadership and Tesla’s long-term vision. Yet, it also sets towering expectations that may prove difficult to meet. The outcome will define not only Musk’s personal wealth but also Tesla’s position in the global technology landscape. Read this also Inside Gaza, BBC sees total devastation after two years of war Bottom line: Tesla shareholders have handed Musk a colossal opportunity—and an equally colossal challenge. The $1 trillion plan embodies both Tesla’s ambition and the immense risks that come with placing so much of its future in one man’s hands.

Inside Gaza, BBC sees total devastation after two years of war

Afham6 months ago6 months ago04 mins

Two years after the war between Israel and Hamas began, the Gaza Strip has been reduced to ruins, with once-thriving neighborhoods now resembling ghost towns. A BBC team granted rare access to the territory describes a landscape of total devastation — homes flattened, hospitals barely functioning, and thousands of displaced families struggling to survive amid the wreckage. Entire districts that were once crowded with markets, schools, and apartment blocks now lie in rubble. In northern Gaza, what used to be Gaza City’s commercial heart is now a sea of collapsed concrete and twisted metal. The BBC crew reported seeing children playing amid debris, their laughter echoing in streets that have no running water, electricity, or sanitation. “It’s like time stopped here,” one resident told reporters. “We are alive, but everything around us is dead.” The humanitarian situation remains dire. The United Nations estimates that more than 1.7 million people — nearly 80 percent of Gaza’s population — are still displaced. Many live in makeshift shelters or tents built from scrap metal and plastic sheets. Food shortages are chronic, with aid deliveries continuing to face restrictions at border crossings. Hospitals, already crippled by years of blockade, are overwhelmed. Doctors work without adequate supplies, and power cuts force surgeries to be done under flashlights. The BBC also visited Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, once the territory’s largest medical facility. Its corridors are dark, lined with patients on stretchers, while generators rumble outside. “We’ve lost colleagues, we’ve lost equipment, and we’re losing patients we could have saved,” said one exhausted doctor. Israel’s government maintains that its military operations were aimed at dismantling Hamas’s military infrastructure, following the deadly attacks that triggered the war in 2023. Officials say rebuilding can only begin once Hamas’s influence is completely removed. However, international aid agencies argue that ordinary civilians have borne the brunt of the destruction, with entire families wiped out and public infrastructure obliterated. Despite calls from global powers for a long-term ceasefire and reconstruction plan, progress has been painfully slow. Many foreign donors remain hesitant to fund rebuilding projects without assurances of stability. Meanwhile, Gazans face another winter with little shelter and minimal hope. At the Rafah crossing on the Egyptian border, crowds gather daily, hoping for rare permits to leave. “We just want to live somewhere safe,” said a young mother holding her child. “We have nothing left here.” Two years on, the BBC’s report paints a bleak picture: a territory trapped between the ruins of war and the uncertainty of peace. For Gaza’s people, survival has become the only measure of victory.

Jamaica in path of ‘life-threatening’ category five Hurricane Melissa

Afham6 months ago6 months ago04 mins

Jamaica is bracing for the full force of Hurricane Melissa, now an extremely dangerous Category 5 storm, as it barrels through the Caribbean with devastating winds and torrential rain. The U.S. National Hurricane Center (NHC) has warned that the storm poses a “life-threatening threat” to the island, bringing the potential for catastrophic damage, flooding, and storm surges. Melissa, with sustained winds exceeding 260 kilometers per hour (160 mph), is the strongest hurricane to form in the Atlantic this season. The hurricane’s eye was located just 150 kilometers southeast of Kingston on Tuesday afternoon, moving northwest at around 20 kilometers per hour. Meteorologists say the storm’s outer bands have already begun lashing Jamaica’s southern coast with heavy rainfall and fierce winds. Authorities have issued evacuation orders for low-lying and coastal areas, including parts of St. Catherine, Clarendon, and St. Elizabeth parishes. Shelters have been opened across the island, and the government has mobilized emergency services, soldiers, and medical personnel in preparation for the storm’s landfall, expected late Tuesday night or early Wednesday morning. Prime Minister Andrew Holness has urged citizens to take the warnings seriously, emphasizing that this hurricane could cause “unprecedented destruction” if residents do not act swiftly. “We are facing a dangerous and unpredictable system. Everyone must move to safety and avoid taking risks,” Holness said during a national address. Meteorologists predict that Melissa could drop up to 600 millimeters (24 inches) of rain in some areas, leading to flash floods and landslides, particularly in mountainous regions. Coastal communities face the risk of storm surges up to 5 meters (16 feet) high, capable of inundating entire neighborhoods and cutting off access to vital infrastructure. Airports across the island have suspended operations, and airlines have canceled flights in and out of Jamaica. The national power company has warned of possible widespread outages as high winds threaten to topple electricity poles and damage transmission lines. After passing Jamaica, Hurricane Melissa is projected to continue northwest toward the Cayman Islands and western Cuba, though slight changes in its path could alter its trajectory. The NHC continues to monitor the storm closely, warning nearby nations to remain vigilant.

Trump says Putin talks ‘don’t go anywhere’ as he imposes new sanctions

Afham6 months ago6 months ago04 mins

Former U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that planned talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin “didn’t go anywhere,” as his administration imposed a fresh round of sanctions on Moscow over its continued military involvement in Ukraine. The statement marks a sharp turn in tone just days after Trump had expressed optimism about brokering a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said his team had “made every effort” to prepare for constructive talks with the Kremlin, but that “the Russian side was not ready to make meaningful commitments.” He added that he would not pursue another meeting “until there’s a real change in attitude from Moscow.” The two leaders had been expected to meet in Budapest later this month to discuss potential steps toward ending the war. The sanctions announced by the U.S. Treasury target more than 40 Russian entities and individuals, including defense manufacturers, energy companies, and senior officials close to the Kremlin. According to Trump, the measures are aimed at “pressuring Russia to engage seriously in peace negotiations” while maintaining support for Ukraine’s sovereignty. “We are not walking away from diplomacy,” Trump said. “But we are not going to waste time when the other side refuses to move toward peace.” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov criticized the new sanctions, calling them “unfriendly and counterproductive.” He said Moscow viewed Washington’s move as “a continuation of pressure politics” and reiterated that Russia would not negotiate “under threats.” Russian state media also downplayed Trump’s comments, suggesting the U.S. was using sanctions to strengthen its negotiating position. In Kyiv, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky welcomed the new U.S. sanctions, saying they demonstrated continued American commitment to Ukraine’s defense. “Every step that isolates Russia’s war machine helps us bring peace closer,” Zelensky said in a televised address. Analysts say the collapse of the planned Trump–Putin meeting underscores the ongoing difficulty in finding common ground on Ukraine, even as both sides face mounting pressure to end the war. “Trump’s decision to suspend talks sends a message that the U.S. expects concrete concessions before engaging further,” said Rachel Kim, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Policy Institute. Read This Also Trump says he did not want ‘wasted meeting’ after plan for Putin talks shelved For now, Washington appears to be balancing a dual strategy of deterrence and diplomacy — maintaining economic and political pressure on Moscow while keeping open the possibility of future talks. Whether these sanctions will push Russia toward meaningful engagement remains uncertain, but Trump’s latest move signals that patience with Putin’s approach is wearing thin.